You are browsing the archive for Vent2Me > Organisational Faux Pas.

Avatar of Vent2Me

by Vent2Me

2012 the year that was: The year of the consumer & the 2012 Vent2Me award for worst customer service…

December 31, 2012 in Consumers, Organisational Faux Pas

Wow! Can you believe that in less than 12 hours the year will be over? What a year it has been. Interestingly it’s been a good year for the consumer. With consumers standing up for themselves in more ways than in previous years. If you don’t believe us see the below results for the Telecommunications Industry Ombdusman (TIO) and the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS):

Telecommunications Ombdusman Quarterly Stats

For the TIO: Complaints have increased by 0.94% over a 12 month period. Interestingly, a quarter of complaints was due to the lack of customer service offered by the provider – no surprises there, this is what we at Vent2Me have been saying since our inception, customer service matters so don’t ignore YOUR customers!

TIO Complaints - Top Issues

Want to know which providers received the most complaints? Read the TIO results by visiting their statistics webpage. Although one can argue that these stats show that things aren’t better for the consumer, we argue that these stats show that consumers feel more empowered and have easier access to the complaint handling process than ever before. Just search #customerservice in twitter and you will see what we mean.

Regarding the FOS: Complaints to their service grew by 19.20%, with the FOS handling on average 3008 complaints a month:Financial Services Ombdudsman Statistics (2011-2012)
Could this increase in complaints be caused by a broader range of insurance products being made available to consumers than in previous years? To read the full report by FOS visit their Annual Review webpage.

Let’s get something straight for the record: Businesses will not change if they do not know why they have to, hence the complaint resolution process is an unnecessary evil – it must be done to ensure continuous improvement.

 

The 2012 Vent2Me Award for Worst Customer Service:

Now from our perspective, the 2012 award for worst customer service goes to Kogan Australia. They received this award because they fail to understand that cheap products does not equal cheap customer service. They also receive this award because they fail to keep up to date with alternative channels of communication, so much so that;

  • It’s extremely difficult to actually locate their phone number on the website,
  • They have blocked customers from posting new wall comments on their facebook page,
  • They do not adequately respond to inquiries/provide sufficient information to the customers.

We really hope that in 2013, Kogan picks up their game and does not become another retailer like Harvey Norman (which is who they did not want to become!). But don’t take out word for it, see below for evidence:

Kogan Page - Facebook Screenshot

 

This image shows Kogan’s facebook page and how they have blocked customers from posting new posts on their facebook wall. Instead, the only way you can contact Kogan via facebook is through a message or by commenting on a post of theirs. This is totally unacceptable as Kogan should want to hear the feedback from their customers – blocking it just shows that they don’t value the opinions of their customers.The next image shows how that when you don’t contact them through a direct message, they tell you to contact Kogan through the web enquiry form! Don’t have these channels in place if you don’t want customers to use them!

Direct message reply from Kogan

The last point and we have spoken about this before, shows how Kogan funnels customers through their online enquiry system rather than allowing customers to use a multiple channels. After all, 90% of customers prefer to resolve complaints via the phone, so why not allow your customers to use this method? BTW – if you are wanting to know the phone number for Kogan, it is: 8677 2272!

Happy new year everyone!

Until next time,

Cents & Sensibility

Avatar of Vent2Me

by Vent2Me

WANTED! Customer Service. The perils of self service checkouts and other things that bug us about Coles supermarket!

November 5, 2012 in Consumers, Organisational Faux Pas

On Thursday, my partner and I went to visit Coles to purchase our weekly shop at 7.30pm. A simple task, but unfortunately Coles made it much more complicated than it needed to be. For starters, we are forced to go through a self-service checkout because no other checkouts besides the express lane were open. I casually asked whether more would open, only to be told rudely ‘No!’ In my teens I used to work at a checkout, so I’m accustomed to operating a checkout, and when you have a few items, they can often be quicker than the normal checkouts. However, when you have a week’s worth of shopping, it really isn’t ideal. Not only did we get stares and cop anger from other customers who wanted to use the self service checkouts, we were stuck using a machine that for whatever reason was very temperamental. As a result, we spent more time waiting for a cashier to come and authorise the transaction than actually putting the items through.

As a result of Coles poor customer service, I had a hunt around to see what effect the automatic self checkouts were having on Coles’ bottom line. It was interesting to note that although profitability has increased for the supermarket chain, staffing rates have drastically declined from 113,311 in 2009 to 102,520 staff members in 2011 (that’s a decline of 10,791 or 10% over three years). No wonder why staff are unwilling to help, if they see these machines as their replacements?

Coles - three year performance summary

Read the rest of this entry →

Avatar of Vent2Me

by Vent2Me

FACT: Customers prefer to resolve their customer service issues using the telephone (90%). WHY THEN… do most businesses ignore this fact?

August 17, 2012 in Consumers, Organisational Faux Pas, Organisations

As customer complaint gurus, we are often asked by colleagues, friends and family the best way to contact businesses to resolve their complaints. And we have noticed an ever increasing trend that businesses are hiding their contact numbers in lieu of other methods including social media, email and online forms. The reasons for this are many including the fact:

  • It is more cost effective from a resource and management point of view
  • It means customers need to actively engage with the business that at times is in the public domain (ie. shows the business can respond to customer complaints)
  • It takes some effort from the customer to engage in (ie. stops some customers from pursuing the complaint)

But what about vulnerable, older or less technological savvy customers who do not have access to or use the above methods? What happens to them? Obviously they are in a particularly bad and unfair situation and its through companies such as Vent2Me that we hope to bridge this gap between organisations and customers.

If you don’t believe that organisations are actively engaging in the above strategies – below are a few examples of organisations/brands who actively hide their contact details:

Read the rest of this entry →

Avatar of Vent2Me

by Vent2Me

The numero uno rule of business: Do not mislead customers!

June 14, 2012 in Consumers, Organisational Faux Pas, Organisations

Let’s be realistic here… except for a few exceptions, businesses are in business to make money, and this will always be their primary objective. Making money is fine, as we all need income to survive, what surprises us though is the misleading tactics that some organisations undertake to make a quick sale.

Take for example, Optus Australia. We were recently notified by their customers that Optus’ sales team has been misleading customers regarding the delivery date of the Samsung Galaxy S3. Worse still, customer expectations were not managed by Optus’ customer service team. If the sales team says that the phone will be ready within two business days and it is not (and they are not notified) how is this good  business practice?

 

Twitter communication from Syneka Marketing regarding misleading tactics by Optus Australia

Read the rest of this entry →

Avatar of Vent2Me

by Vent2Me

It’s important to check facts + the power of social media

May 22, 2012 in Organisational Faux Pas, Organisations

In today’s day and age, it still surprises us that orgaisations can get their facts wrong. With the internet checking facts is easier than it has ever been (of course you need to make sure it’s a reliable source – but that’s a topic for another day!) We recently subscribed to Facebook posts by Daily Life – an online magazine/website dedicated to topics relating to entertainment, news, love and life and fashion.

The other day they had an article about the new tv show ‘The Carrie Diaries’, the article was well written but had a major incorrect flaw to it. Do you think you can spot it?

The Daily Life - Carrie Diaries (Spot the mistake!)

Anyone who was a fan of Sex and the City would know there wasn’t three  movies but just two. Although this mistake isn’t a serious one, it does show how easy it is to make a mistake and why you must proof read materials! This mistake could have easily been avoided by doing a simple google search.

Now, how does the power of social media relate to this example? Quite simply, Daily Life posted about the article on their facebook page.

Daily Life - FB page

Social media allows organisations to interact with their users/customers in ways that organisations could not do in previous years. As a result, organisations must be aware of the fact that they may not get the responses they don’t normally want! In this case, Daily Life responded to the issue in the best way possible - admitted to their mistake, fixed it up straight away and thanked the consumer for their input!

The Daily Life - Carrie Diaries V2

The lesson here is if you do make a mistake, own up to it, fix the mistake (don’t try to hide it). Remember  to be effective in social media, you must be transparent!

Until next time,

Cents and Sensibility

Avatar of Vent2Me

by Vent2Me

Everyone makes mistakes – simple tips to improve the proofreading process of your business

January 17, 2012 in Consumers, Organisational Faux Pas, Organisations

Spot the mistake with My Career?

SPOT THE MISTAKE: MyCareer makes up dates for 2012!

Here’s a hint for you, look at the last date in March and then the first date in April. As you can see the month of April is wrong. Now, how can a multi-million dollar business such as My Career get this so wrong? Well the answer is a LACK of proof reading of course!

Read the rest of this entry →

Avatar of Vent2Me

by Vent2Me

In today’s day and age companies think it’s acceptable to keep you waiting over 18 minutes

April 30, 2011 in Consumers, Organisational Faux Pas

For work, I had to ring a company to organise payment and to clarify a few questions – pretty easy stuff, right? Wrong! I had to suffer through 18 minutes of on-hold music and voice overs before I got fed up and hung up.

Read below to find out who the company is!

Read below to find out who the company is!

Read the rest of this entry →

Avatar of Vent2Me

by Vent2Me

The first organisational faux pas for 2011!

April 24, 2011 in Consumers, Organisational Faux Pas, Organisations

Every month or so we will upload and discuss a faux pas of an organisation. It will be a fun and interesting way to shed light on the issue of service marketing.

In this edition, we will focus on the recent incorrect online advert that was shown on Optus Webmail on 17th of April 2011.

Read the rest of this entry →